1 2025:CGHC:36396-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3861 of 2025 Lal Bahadur S/o Paras Ram Yadav Aged About 53 Years Yadu Niwas, Tiranga Road, Bhatapara R/o In Front Of Sundar Vihar Colony Chhota Bhawani Nagar, Kota Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director Directorate of Higher Education, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Commissioner Directorate of Higher Education, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Principal Government Gajanand Agrawal Post Graduate College, Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 5. Shrimati Nisha Sharma Earlier Posted As In-Charge Principal, Govt. Gajanand Agrawal University, Bhatapara, Balodabazar-Bhatapara, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) ...Respondent(s) BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.07.28 17:29:40 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Saket Pandey, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Prafull N. Bharat, Advocate General, assisted by Mr. Shashank Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 28.07.2025 1. Heard Mr. Saket Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Prafull N. Bharat, learned Advocate General, assisted by Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the State. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly direct the respondent authorities to conduct robust enquiry upon the complaints of the petitioner, in the interest of justice. 10.2. That, any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deemed just and fit in facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. Learned Advocate General has apprised this Court that appropriate action has already been initiated against respondent No. 5 in accordance with law. It has been submitted that, pursuant to the findings of the concerned authority, recovery proceedings have been initiated against 3 respondent No. 5. These proceedings have been formally commenced vide order dated 11.07.2025. 4. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition. 5. Prayer is allowed. 6. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan