RAHUL SHARMA S/O ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA v. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
CW/20436/2023 · 2025-02-14
Narendra Singh Dhaddha, Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34287 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34287 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:6528-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20436/2023
1. Rahul Sharma S/o Ashok Kumar Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ladiya Mohalla, Near Sagar, Alwar, Rajasthan.
2. Jeetram Yadav S/o Prahlad Lal Yadav, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village- Sitarampura, Post- Mandawar, Tonk, Rajasthan.
3. Mahendra Kumar Gauttam S/o Radheshyam Gouttam, Aged About 27 Years, R/o VPO Shahar, Tehsil- Nadoti, Karoli, Rajasthan.
4. Yudhisthir Singh Sankhla S/o Dushyant Singh Sankhla, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 100 A, Sharmik Pura, Baba Ramdev Mandir Ke Paas Wali Gali, Masuriya, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
5. Babalu Saini S/o Kailash Saini, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village- Khatwa, Tehsil- Lalsot, Dausa, Rajasthan.
6. Ronak Kakra D/o Mahesh Chand, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Kakro Ka Mohalla, Kishangarh, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Rajasthan High Court, Through Its Registrar (General), Rajasthan High Court, Principal Seat Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
2. The Registrar (Examination), Rajasthan High Court, Principal Seat Jodhpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Verma for Mr. Shivatma Kumar Tank For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shailesh Prakash Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 14/02/2025
Learned counsel for the respondent(s) submits that Hon’ble Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.27348/2023 has
[2025:RJ-JP:6528-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-20436/2023] stayed the operation of the impugned judgment dated 18.09.2023, which was passed in identical D.B.C.W.P. No. 7564/2023 titled as Rajat Yadav and Ors. Vs. Rajasthan High Court and Anr. In this view of the matter, the civil writ petition stands
disposed of. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to file an application for revival of this petition after order of the Hon'ble Apex Court.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Tahir/Sunita/1