Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34280 (RAJ)

VICTIM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/13/2023 · 2025-01-03

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 13/2023 Victim, Aged About 35 Years, R/o ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Superintendent of Police, District Tonk (Raj.) 3. SHO, Police Station Sadar Tonk, District Tonk. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 9736/2022 1. Devendra Kumar Son of Shri Dhanna Lal, Aged About 53 Years, Resident of Ganesh Mandir Ke Niche, Annapurna Dungri, Tonk, District Tonk (Raj.) 2. Aryan @ Neeraj Kumar Son of Shri Devendra Kumar, Resident Of Ganesh Mandir Ke Niche, Annapurna Dungri, Tonk, District Tonk (Raj.) 3. Ranjeet Kumar Bairwa Son Of Shri Devendra Kumar, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Ganesh Mandir Ke Niche, Annapurna Dungri, Tonk, District Tonk (Raj.) 4. Anita Wife Of Shri Devendra Kumar, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Ganesh Mandir Ke Niche, Annapurna Dungri, Tonk, District Tonk (Raj.) 5. Mukesh Kumar Verma Son Of Shri Prem Chandra Verma, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Near Vishal Hotel, Grain Godam Road, Station Bazariya, Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 6. Kiran Bairwa Wife Of Mukesh Kumar Verma, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Near Vishal Hotel, Grain Godam Road, Station Bazariya, Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 7. Ajay Kumar Son Of Shri Raju Lal Bairwa, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of A-12, Sudarshan Vatika, Vatika, Jaipur (Raj.) 8. Pallvi Bairwa Wife Of Shri Ajay Kuamar, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of A-12, Sudarshan Vatika, Vatika, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners (2 of 2) [CRLW-13/2023] Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. Victim, R/o ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitabh Jatav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 03/01/2025 It is stated at bar that after investigation, final report negative has been submitted, hence under the changed circumstances, both petitions have become infructuous. Both criminal writ petitions stand dismissed as having become infructuous. Stay application(s) and all other application(s), pending if any, also stand dismissed. However, the complainant would be at liberty to avail other remedies available to him under the provisions of law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/126-127