IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK Bansi @ Bansing Jani (In BLAPL No.5155 of 2025) Arijit Takri and another (In BLAPL No.3069 of 2025) Deepa @ Arpita Takri and another (In BLAPL No.3537 of 2025) … Petitioners Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocate (in BLAPL No.5155 of 2025) Ms. M. Sahoo, Advocate (in BLAPL Nos.3069 & 3537 of 2025) -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. R.B. Mishra, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL) 09.07.2025 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. Since these three bail applications arise out of one and same case record, the same are heard together and disposed of by this common order with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 3. These are the bail applications U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioners for grant of bail in connection with Papadahandi PS Case No.21 of 2025 corresponding to CT Case No.24 of 2025 pending in the file of learned District and Sessions Judge, Nabarangpur, being charge-sheeted for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.80/ 85/ 108/ 238/ 3(5) of BNS r/w Section 4 of DP Act, on the allegation of committing dowry death and abetting commission of suicide of the deceased by subjecting her to torture and cruelty for demand of dowry, along with co-accused husband. 4. Heard, Mr. Sangram Keshari Rout, learned counsel for the petitioner in BLAPL No.5155 of 2025; Ms. Mohini Sahoo, learned counsel for the petitioner in BLAPL Nos.3069 & 3537 of 2025 and Mr. R.B. Mishra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record. 5. After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioners vis-à-vis the accusations sought to be brought against them and regard being had to the status of the petitioners as mother-in- law, father-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law and brother-in-law of the husband of the deceased (Nanadei) and keeping in view the submission of charge-sheet in the meantime and taking into account the pre trial detention of the petitioners in custody, this Court without expressing any view on merits admits each of the petitioners to bail. 6. Hence, these three bail applications of the petitioners namely Bansi @ Bansing Jani in BLAPL No.5155 of 2025; Arijit Takri & Ananta Prasad Takri in BLAPL No.3069 of 2025 and Deepa @ Arpita Takri & Surama Takri in BLAPL No.3537 of 2025 are allowed and each of the petitioners is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following conditions:- (i) the petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail, (ii) the petitioners in the course of trial shall attend the trial Court on each date of posting without fail unless their attendance is dispensed with. In case the Petitioners fail without sufficient cause to appear in the Court in accordance with the terms of the bail, the learned trial Court may proceed against the Petitioners for offence U/S.269 of BNS, 2023 in accordance with law, (iii) the petitioners shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of the trial Court without prior permission till disposal of the case by intimating their present address of stay to the concerned Court. It is clarified that the Court in seisin of the case will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioners without further reference to this Court, if any of the above conditions are violated or a case for cancellation of bail is otherwise made out. In the wake of aforesaid, the subsequent involvement of the petitioners in future for similar/grave offences on prima facie accusations may be treated as a ground for cancellation of bail in this case. 7. Accordingly, these BLAPL Nos.5155, 3069 and 3537 of 2025 stand disposed of. 8. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. (G. Satapathy) Judge Subhasmita Designation: Sr. Stenographer