1 2025:CGHC:39580 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7678 of 2025 1 - Preetam Kumar S/o Arjun Singh Aged About 43 Years Posted As- Teacher (L.B.) Maths, At- Sejas, Faridnagar, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh H.Q.- Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Joint Director Education Division, Durg (C.G.) 4 - The Collector District Durg (C.G.) 5 - The District Education Officer Cum Member Secretary District Yuktiyutkaran Samiti, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh kumar Kesharwani, Advocate. For State-Respondents : Mr. Suyash Dhar Badgaiya, Deputy Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 07-08-2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petition filed by the petitioner against his/her transfer order after declaring surplus Teacher under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions, was disposed of with liberty to move fresh representation and in turn the District Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07-07-2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07-07-2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07-07- 2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her detailed representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07-07-2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, by passing the reasoned order in view of the grievance raised by the petitioner. Sd/ (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil