[2025:RJ-JP:4927] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 24934/2018 Mohd. Ajeem S/o Mohammad Saleem, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Education Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer (Primary), Sawai Madhopur. 4. The District Education Officer (Primary), Udaipur. 5. The Block Elementary Education Officer, P.s. Kotara, Udaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 04/02/2025 1. By way of filing the instant writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the respondents to grant early service benefits to the petitioner in the light of the circular dated 09.08.2018. 2. It appears that before approaching this Court, the petitioner had sent a notice for demand of justice to the respondents for redressal of grievances. However, no action was taken on the same. Hence, the petitioner has approached this Court. 3. In the considered opinion of this Court, whenever a representation/notice is submitted in the office of State [2025:RJ-JP:4927] (2 of 2) [CW-24934/2018] authorities, it is expected from the concerned authorities to decide the same, in accordance with law, the same view was also taken in the case of Pawan Meena vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.; S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024. 4. Looking to the fact that the representation submitted by the petitioner is still pending and the same has not been decided till date. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of by issuing directions to the respondents to decide the same, expeditiously, as early as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same, strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Garima/158