Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34267 (RAJ)

MUSTAK S/O IDRISH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15462/2024 · 2025-02-05

Narendra Singh Dhaddha

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 4th Bail Application No. 15462/2024 Mustak S/o Idrish, R/o Village Gavdi, P.s. Jurhara, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) (At Present The Accused In Judicial Custody At Sub Jail Deeg (Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Azad Ahmed, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, Dy.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 05/02/2025 1. The present 4th bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.13/2014 Registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 IPC. (later on offence(s) under Sections 148, 323, 325, 307 and 302 IPC were found to have been made out). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He is behind the bars for more than six years. Charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that co-accused persons were enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Benches of this court. He further submits that till today, the trial court has not recorded evidence of any witnesses. Conclusion of trial may take long time. So, the petitioner be enlarged on bail. (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15462/2024] 3. Learned Dy.G.A. has opposed the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted that the petitioner had fired on Abdul Shakoor and he died on account of fire arm injury. So, looking to the gravity of offence, the 4th bail application filed by the petitioner be dismissed. 4. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Dy.G.A.. 5. Allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner had fired on Abdul Shakoor and he died on account of fire arm injury. So, looking to the gravity of offence and nature of allegation, I do not consider it a fit case to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Consequently, this 4th bail application is dismissed. 6. However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial without giving unnecessary adjournments. 7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the trial court for information and necessary compliance. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Gourav/21