Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34267 (JHR)

RAMAKANT MISHRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/640/2024 · 2025-10-17

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:32291 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 640 of 2024 Ramakant Mishra, aged about 62 years, son of Guru Charan Mishra, resident of Nimiya, Near J.S. College Gate, village Nimiya, Daltonganj, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, District Palamau … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Aboobacker Siddique, father’s name not known to the petitioner, the Secretary, Cooperative Societies, Govt. of Jharkhand, P.O. & P.S. – Doranda, District – Ranchi 3. Suraj Kumar, father’s name not known to the Petitioner, Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Ranchi, P.O. – GPO, P.S. _ Doranda, District - Ranchi. … … Opp. Parties --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, AC to Rahul Kr., Adv. For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Karan Shahdeo, AC to SC II --- 05/17.10.2025 The learned counsels for the parties are present. 2. This petition has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for their alleged willful disobedience and deliberate violation of the order dated 26.02.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 2009 of 2023. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that revised pension and gratuity has not been paid to the petitioner. 4. To this, the learned counsel for the opposite parties has submitted that the matter has been sent to the office of learned Accountant General and the opposite party no.2 undertakes to follow up the matter with the office of Accountant General so that the amount is ultimately paid. He has also submitted that the Accountant General is not a party in the present proceedings. 2025:JHHC:32291 2 5. Considering the aforesaid submission, this Court is not inclined to proceed any further in this contempt proceeding in view of the submission/undertaking made by the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, as recorded above. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 17.10.2025 Saurav Uploaded on 18.10.2025