Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34267 (AP)

THATIMAKULA VENKATA SAILAJA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/7835/2022 · 2025-02-13

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010526552022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL Between: Thatimakula Venkata Sailaja and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. A SYAM SUNDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioner Accused Nos.1 and 2, seeking quashment of the proceedings them in C.F.R.No.506 of 2021 in un Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kadapa. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7835 OF 2022 Thatimakula Venkata Sailaja and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): A SYAM SUNDAR REDDY Respondent/complainant(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioner seeking quashment of the proceedings them in C.F.R.No.506 of 2021 in un-numbered C.C on the file of II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kadapa. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioners/ seeking quashment of the proceedings pending against numbered C.C on the file of II Additional 2. Sri A. Syam Sundar Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the relief has become infructuous and petition may be disposed of. 3. Ms. K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State are in attendance. 4. In that view, the Criminal Petition is dismissed, since relief has become infructuous. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 13.02.2025 KK