Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8095 CRL.RP No. 1337 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1337 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI. V ANANDA KUMAR S/O V CHANDRASHEKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O GANGA NILAYA, NEAR GRAMA OFFICE, CHITRADURGA ROAD, CHALLAKERE-577522. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAKSHITH K S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. T THIPPESWAMY S/O R BOMMANAYAKA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC: LIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, JEEVAN BHAGYA NILAYA, VALMIKI NAGARA, CHALLAKERE-577522. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SRINIVAS N., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.09.2024 PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.107/2023 ON THE FILE OF PRL. DIST.
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHITRADURGA, CONFIRMING THE
JUDGMENT PASSED IN C.C.NO.427/2018 ON THE FILE OF PRL.
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHALLAKERE DATED 06.05.2023 BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE RP AND THEREBY ACQUIT THE ACCUSED / REVISION PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8095 CRL.RP No. 1337 of 2024
138 OF N.I. ACT OR REMAND BACK THE CASE TO PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY TO THE ACCUSED TO FULLY CROSS EXAMINE THE COMPLAINANT UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL ORDER
This Court vide order dated 19.12.2024 suspended the sentence, and the same was not complied. Thereafter, on 29.01.025, an application was filed by the petitioner seeking extension of time and the same was also rejected, and this Court also given liberty to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with the law.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a warrant has already been issued against the petitioner for non-compliance with the order, he seeks time for compliance.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondent also submitted that in spite of the warrant being issued by the court, not made any application before this Court seeking
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8095 CRL.RP No. 1337 of 2024
further time and not showing any interest in pursuing the matter.
4. Once, the prayer was already rejected and also did not comply with the order, the question of considering this revision does not arise. Having taken note of the said fact and in view of non-compliance of the order passed by this Court, the revision petition stands dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SKS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49