APHC010525662003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 16799/2003 Between: 1. R.KESAVULU.,CUDDAPAH, S/O RATHNAM DIVISIONAL ENGINEER (OPERATION UNDER SUSPENSION., A.P.STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED., RAJAMPET., CUDDAPAH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE CHAIRMAN AND M D A P S POWER DISTRIBUTION CORP LTD, A.P.State Power Distribution Corporation Limited., Tirupathi., Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for all the connected records including the impugned Memo No. CE/HRD/DS/AsIII/PO D.No.1098/2002 dated 4-9-2002 and the consequential rejection order in Memo No.CMD/CGM/HRD/DS/AS.III/PO(DC)/D.No.192/03 dated 28-2-2003 of the respondent and quash the same as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and contrary to law and violative of principles of natural justice IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 20859 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the operation of the impugned proceedings of the respondent Memo No.CE/HRD/DS/AS III/PO D.No.1098/2002 dated 4-9-2002 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K G KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 2. S RAVINDRANATH The Court made the following order: Sri Ch.Venkatesh, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petitioner is not in touch with him and could not get instructions from him. When the matter is pending consideration, the petitioner shall invariably pursue the matter. Despite the same, it shows that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the matter. Since the matter is of the year 2003 and the petitioner is having no interest in prosecuting the matter, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution. 2. Accordingly, this Writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. If at all the petitioner feels that cause in this writ petition survives, he can move an appropriate application within two(02) months. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS