KOSHALYA DEVI W/O SHRI BHAGAT SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/15413/2024 · 2025-01-03
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34263 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34263 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:416] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15413/2024 Koshalya Devi W/o Shri Bhagat Singh, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Chhunk, Tehsil And District Mahendragarh, Hariyana. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shailender Singh Balwada For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Ms. Manju Dave, PP, Mr. Mamraj Jat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 03/01/2025
1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.441/2018 registered at Police Station Behror, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC, the accused- petitioner has preferred this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner and the complainant- Saroj Devi have amicably settled the matter and arrived at compromise. The petitioner is in custody since long. The allegations levelled against the petitioner is pertaining to Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC, which are exclusively triable by Magistrate. There is civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the complainant and trial/investigation of the case may take
[2025:RJ-JP:416] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15413/2024] considerable time, therefore, anticipatory bail of the accused- petitioner may be allowed.
3.
Learned counsel for the complainant conceded the fact that the petitioner and the complainant- Saroj Devi have arrived at amicable settlement and he submitted an affidavit owned by the complainant- Saroj Devi and contended that, if benefit of bail may be grant to the accused-petitioner, then they have no objection.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
5. Heard and perused the material available on record.
6. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Considering the fact that the petitioner has remained in custody since long and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time and the allegations levelled against the petitioner are triable by Magistrate, therefore, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused- petitioner.
7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Koshalya Devi W/o Shri Bhagat Singh, in connection with FIR No.441/2018 registered at Police Station Behror, District Alwar, she shall be released on bail, provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-
[2025:RJ-JP:416] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15413/2024] (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/61