Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34260 (RAJ)

WAHEED S/O MUNSHI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15552/2024 · 2025-02-28

Anil Kumar Upman

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8991] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15552/2024 Waheed S/o Munshi, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Dhana, Police Station Punhana, District Nuh Haryana. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Kumar Sain, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.87/1992 registered at Police Station Pahadi, District Bharatpur for the offences punishable under Sections 395 & 397 of IPC. Charge-sheet has been filed for offences punishable under Sections 395, 397 & 120B of IPC. 2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the present matter is of bail jump. He contends that due to unavoidable circumstances, the petitioner could not appear before the learned trial court on the date fixed. He submits that other co-accused persons have been acquitted by learned trial court. It is submitted that the petitioner is ready to appear before the learned trial court on each and every date as fixed by the trial court. It is further submitted that petitioner is ready to deposit the fine amount [2025:RJ-JP:8991] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15552/2024] under Section 446 Cr.P.C. He thus, prays that the instant bail application may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Considering the overall facts & circumstances of the case and on the undertaking of the petitioner's counsel that henceforth the petitioner shall appear on each and every date as fixed by the trial court and he is ready to deposit the fine amount under Section 446 Cr.P.C., I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Waheed S/o Munshi, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to [2025:RJ-JP:8991] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15552/2024] immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /133