Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34259 (JHR)

SINDOLI HEMBRAM ALIAS SINDOLI HEMBROM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2219/2025 · 2025-10-16

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:32133 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 2219 of 2025 Sindoli Hembram @ Sindoli Hembrom, aged about 41 years, wife of Sahadeo Soren, resident of Village- Sirsiya, P.O.- Kanki, P.S.- Khaga, District- Deoghar. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …. Opp. Party ------ CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Singh, Advocate Mr. Virendra Kumar, Advocate ----- 5/ 16.10.2025 Heard the parties. 2. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. No. 44 of 2024 arising out of Khaga P.S. Case No. 42 of 2023 corresponding to G.R. No. 661 of 2023, for the offences registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Madhupur at Deoghar. 3. Bail application of this petitioner was earlier rejected by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court in B.A. No. 3912 of 2024 by order dated 06.08.2024. 4. The petitioner happens to be the mother-in-law of the deceased, who was immolated to death in her matrimonial home. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has submitted that several mechanical injuries were found on the person of the deceased. 6. Report regarding the stage of trial, earlier called for, has been received. It appears that out of thirteen charge-sheeted witnesses, nine witnesses have been examined. Learned Trial Court has further stated that trial is likely to be concluded by December, 2025. 7. In view of nature of allegation and the fact that trial is on the verge of its conclusion, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, her prayer for bail is rejected. (Ambuj Nath, J.) R.Kr.