Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34258 (PNJ)

DIDAR SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB, ETC.

CWP/6688/2004 · 2025-04-05

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 714 Didar Singh State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: None Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the order dat 12.03.2004 making ineffective the order dated 16.03.1996 whereby petitioner was promoted as Junior Assistant w.e.f. 03.08.1993. 2. Learned State counsel while referring to the written statement submits that under Rule 11 of the Punjab District Service seniority of the official in their new District of posting and petitioner having been transferred on his own request, by mut at the tail of the 3. D case lis still subsists. 05.04.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6688 Date of decision: 05.04.2025 ..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY None for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the order dat 12.03.2004 making ineffective the order dated 16.03.1996 whereby petitioner was promoted as Junior Assistant w.e.f. 03.08.1993. Learned State counsel while referring to the written statement submits that under Rule 11 of the Punjab District Service seniority of the officials was to be determined new District of posting and petitioner having been transferred on his own by mutual transfer, to Fatehgarh Sahib the seniority, as such, the order impugned was rightly passed. Disposed of reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived in still subsists. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 6688-2004 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.04.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the order dat 12.03.2004 making ineffective the order dated 16.03.1996 whereby petitioner was promoted as Junior Assistant w.e.f. 03.08.1993. Learned State counsel while referring to the written statement submits that under Rule 11 of the Punjab District Service (Class-III) Rules, 1976, was to be determined from the date of their appointment new District of posting and petitioner having been transferred on his own to Fatehgarh Sahib on 22.05.1993 and was adjusted the order impugned was rightly passed. isposed of reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived in ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the order dated 12.03.2004 making ineffective the order dated 16.03.1996 whereby petitioner Learned State counsel while referring to the written statement III) Rules, 1976, from the date of their appointment new District of posting and petitioner having been transferred on his own was adjusted isposed of reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived in ASHOK KUMAR 2025.04.05 15:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document