Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34251 (KAR)

D M LAKSHMAIAH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/26184/2022 · 2025-06-19

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21265 WP NO.26184 OF 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.26184 OF 2022 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: D.M. LAKSHMAIAH SINCE DEAD BY LRS. 1(a) MRS. VANAJA W/O LATE D.M. LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS. 1(b) MRS. MAMATHA LAXMAN D/O LATE D.M. LAKSHMAIAH W/O ALEMAYEHU WORKU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. 1(c) MS. SAVITHA L. D/O LATE D.M. LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. 1(d) MR. SANJAY KUMAR L. S/O LATE D.M. LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. 1(e) SRI. SANDEEP L. S/O LATE D.M. LAKSHAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT: SY.NO.199 (OLD NO.98) M. HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (APARA) TALUK, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU DISTRICT - 562 129. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRAKASH TIMMANNA HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21265 WP NO.26184 OF 2022 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 5TH FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. 3. THE TAHASILDAR YELAHANKA TALUK, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU DISTRICT - 560 064 4. SMT. YASHODHAMMA D/O LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. 5. SMT. BAIYAMMA D/O LAKSHMAMMA AGED BOUT 70 YEARS. 6. SRI. PALAVALASA APPALA RAJU S/O PALAVALASA JOGINAIDU AGE: MAJOR, RESPONDENTS 4 TO 6 ARE R/AT M. HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT - 562 129. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. CHETAN DESAIH, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21265 WP NO.26184 OF 2022 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 22ND AUGUST, 2022 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2-ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER IN CASE NO.R.A.(YLK)NO.220/2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-A, AND CONSEQUENTLY , DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3-TAHSILDAR, YELAHANKA TALUK TO RESTORE THE MR.77/2005-06 VIDE ANNEXURE-E IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF 4 ACRES OF LAND IN SURVEY NO.199 OF M. HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, petitioners are assailing the order dated 22nd August, 2022 (Annexure-A) passed by the respondent No.2 under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 in R.A.(YLK)No.220/2020. 2. Sri. Manjunath K., learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 3 submitted that the petitioners are having efficacious remedy under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 to challenge the impugned order. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21265 WP NO.26184 OF 2022 3. In that view of the matter, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to approach the competent authority under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, within three weeks from the date of receipt of this order. It is made clear that, if the petitioners approach the competent authority as stated above, the time spent by the petitioners before this Court shall be condoned by the competent revisional authority. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. 4. In view of disposal of the writ petition, pending IA.2 of 2024, stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28