1 2025:CGHC:2674 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 396 of 2025 1 - Amit Kumar Khatkar S/o Chatram Deo Khatkar Aged About 42 Years R/o Beside Tahsil Office Pamgarh P.O. / Tah. Pamgarh District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Law And Legislative Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Police Station And Post Rakhi Atal Nagar New Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - High Court Of Chhattisgarh Through Registrar General Chhattisgarh High Court Bodri Bilaspur District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Secretary Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission Shankar Nagar Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Controller Of Examination Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission Shankar Nagar Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Ritesh Verma, Advocate For State/Respondent No.1 : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiya, Dy. GA For Respondent No.2 Mr. Anurag Dayal Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents No.3 & 4 Mr. Amitesh Tiwari, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI 2 Order on Board 16/01/2025 1. Heard. 2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for following reliefs: “10.1. that, the respondent may kindly be directed to submit the entire records as regards the petitioner's case. 10.2. that, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash/amend the advertisement No. 04/2024/Exam/Dated 23/12/2024 of respondent No.3, (Ann.-P/1). Further, the Hon'ble Court directs the respondents to consider and grant relaxation to the petitioner by amending paragraph 3 (iv) (B) of the advertisement (Ann.- P/1) within stipulated time frame, in the interest of justice. 10.3. that, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to make correction in the advertisement issued by respondent No. 3, for appointment of upcoming Civil Judge (Junior Division) Exam 2024. 10.4. that, this Hon'ble Court may kindly pass any order or issue any suitable writ as may deem fit under the circumstances of the case including the cost of the petition.” 3. Learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 have raised an objection that the petition itself is not maintainable as the relief as prayed for by the petitioner is sketchy one, the petitioner is required to challenge the recruitment rules, which can only be 3 challenged before the appropriate forum, which the petitioner has not done. 4. At this juncture, facing the said situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a duly constituted petition challenging the recruitment rules itself. 5. The liberty as prayed for is granted. 6. With this observation, the petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi