IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY. THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 528 OF 2002 Appeal under section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.S No. 59 of 1997 Dated 10.07.2001 confirming Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.659 of 1990 dated 13.02.1997, on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Rajahmundry. Between: Jujjavarapu Satyanarayana @ Satyanarayana Prasad, S/o Venkataratnam, Gandhipuram-1 Rajahmundry. RDMC. ...Appellant/Plaintiff AND Life Insurance Corporation of India, Rep. by its Divisional Manger Visakhapatnam. ...Respondent/Defendant Counsel for the Appellant: SRI. G KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent: SRI SINGAM SRINIVASA RAO The Court made the following JUDGMENT:- APHC010017292002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 528/2002 Between: ...APPELLANT J.satyanarayana. AND ...RESPONDENT Life Insu Corp Fo India Rep D Mangr Visa Counsel for the Appellant: 1.G KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent: 1.SINGAM SRINIVASA RAO The Court made the following JUDGMENT: This Second Appeal was filed by the appellant/plaintiff under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 10.07.2001 passed in A.S.No.59 of 1997 on the file of learned II Additional District Judge’s Court, East Godavari at Rajahmundry, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 13.02.1997 passed in O.S.No.659 of 1990 on the file of learned Principal District Munsif Court, Rajahmundry. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal has become infructuous as the cause does 1. 2. not survive. In response, learned counsel for the respondent reported no objection for dismissal of the appeal without costs. Recording the said submission of learned counsel for the appellant and as the cause does not survive for adjudication, the Second Appeal is dismissedas infructuous.However,there shall be no order as to costs. 3. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal District Munsif Court, Rajahmundry. (with records) 2. The II Additional District Judge East Godavari Rajahmundry. (with records) 3. The Life Insurance Corporation of India, Rep. Divisional Manager, Visakhapatnam. 4. One CC to Sri G Krishna Murthy, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri Singam Srinivasa Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 6. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. 7. Three CD Copies SD sree high court DATED;08/01/2025 JUDGMENT SA.No.528 of 2002 I I 2 MAR 2025 S ^ * Current oecuon . ^ °'®!nfructuousSouTcosts 3 AS 1