Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34249 (PNJ)

SANDEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/7937/2025 · 2025-04-09

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 111 Sandeep Kumar State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. respondents to re counting total length of service. 2. covered by the judgment Punjab, 2023(3) 23.11.2024, Annexure P has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. 3. merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sandeep Kumar Versus f Punjab and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Dr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for respondents to re-fix and grant the pensionary benefits of the petitioner by ounting total length of service. Learned counsel submits that the issue involved is squarely covered by the judgment in the case of , 2023(3) (P & H) PLR 612, regarding which legal notice dated , Annexure P-7, has been served upon the responden has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenti merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-7937-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 09.04.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the fix and grant the pensionary benefits of the petitioner by Learned counsel submits that the issue involved is squarely in the case of Amarjit Singh vs. State of regarding which legal notice dated has been served upon the respondents, which has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.04.09 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-7937-2025 -2- the respondents to decide the legal notice dated 23.11.2024, within a period of 4 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 09.04.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.04.09 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.