Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3424 (AP)

HINDU AIDED PRADHAMIKA PATASALA v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER

CMA/255/2013 · 2025-08-28

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010016282013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 255/2013 Between: 1. HINDU AIDED PRADHAMIKA PATASALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CORRESPONDENT SRI ALAPATI VENKATESWARLU, S/O.RAMA MURTHY, R/O. ALLURU (V), PITTALAVANIPALEM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...APPELLANT AND 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER, ENDOWMENTS, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI LAKSHMI NARASIMHA SWAMY TEMPLE, ALLURU (V), PITTALAVANIPALEM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CMAMP 574 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings by suspending the judgment (Award) and Decree judgment (Award) and Decree dated 28.12.2012 made in OA.No.20/2012 on the file of the A.P.Endowments Tribunal, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the Appeal Counsel for the Appellant: 1. RAMA RAO GHANTA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KAPPERA KOTESWARA RAO SC for Endowments, AP Region. The Court made the following JUDGMENT: Sri Saripudi Raja Mouli, learned counsel, representing Sri Rama Rao Ghanta, learned counsel for the appellant, submits that the cause in the civil miscellaneous appeal does not survive for adjudication. Recording the above submission, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 29.08.2025 KAS