APHC010527112012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1124/2012 Between: 1. SARIPELLA SUJAYANANNDA KUMAR RAJU, S/O. LATE SURYANARAYANA RAJU, HINDU, CULTIVATION, MANDALAPARRU, NIDAMARRU, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. MANTENA VENKATA SUBBA RAJU ANOTHER, S/O. BAPIRAJU, HINDU, CULTIVATION, MANDALAPARRU, NIDAMARRU, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. SARIPELLA SURYANARAYANA RAJU DIED, - ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 2139 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Judgment and Decree dated 04.09.2012 in AS No. 78/2004 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem, pending disposal of the above CMA. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CMAMP 754 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 311 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the sole appellant in the above appeal IA NO: 2 OF 2017(CMAMP 755 OF 2017 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the sole appellant in the above appeal IA NO: 3 OF 2017(CMAMP 756 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased bring 1. Lakshmi Prasanna (Wife) 2. Subrahamanyeswari Praneetha 3. Naga Suryanarayana Raju (Son) the legal representives of the deceased sole appellant as appellants 2 to 4 in the above appeal Counsel for the Appellant: 1. T V JAGGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K S MURTHY The Court made the following JUDGMENT: Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the cause in the present appeal does not survive for adjudication and the appeal has become infructuous. 2. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the appellant, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous pending applications if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ SUMATHI JAGADAM,J Dated: 03.07.2025 SCS 3 10 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1124/2012 Dated: 03.07.2025 SCS