Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34231 (ORI)

RAMESH CHANDRA MISHRA v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/14491/2025 · 2025-07-14

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.14491 of 2025 Ramesh Chandra Mishra …. Petitioner Mr. P.K. Mohapatra, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. C.K. Pradhan, AGA COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 14.07.2025 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:- i) direct the opp. parties to Step up the pay of the petitioner at par with his junior and similarly situated employees viz-Sudarshan Mohapatra, Padman Mandal and Godabarisha Acharya under the Koraput Education Circle in terms of Govt. in Finance department O.M. dated 21.10.2010 and order No. 18409(255), dated 08.04.2010 as has been extended to Padman Mandal and consequent upon such fixation of pay, the differential arrear salary of the petitioner as due and admissible may be released and his pension may be revised accordingly within a stipulated period; p. 2 p. 2 i) Pass such other order (s)/direction(s) as would be deem fit and proper in the bonafide interest of Justice; And for which act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.3 vide Annexure-5 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-5 within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Jyoti