2025:HHC:38913 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 15678 of 2025 Decided on : 18.11.2025 Sh. Minku Ram …Petitioner Versus The Deputy Commissioner and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Vishal Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Respondents No.3 & 4 stands served. Mr. Vishal Singh Thakur, learned counsel, has put in appearance on behalf of the said respondents. 2. In light of the prayers made in this petition and in light of the fact that notice has already been issued one Sh. 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:38913 Shakti Chand, respondent No.3, under Section 163 of the H.P. Land Revenue Act, these proceedings are disposed of without any observations on the merit of the issue, with the direction that the proceedings which have been initiated under Section 163 of the H.P. Land Revenue Act, be taken to their logical conclusion, within a period of six months, in accordance with law and after hearing the parties concerned. 3. The petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 18, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)