Yeruva Kasi Lakshamma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/24785/2018 · 2025-01-27
B S Bhanumathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34226 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34226 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010526102018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Yeruva Kasi Lakshamma The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the following relief:
“…to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature writ of mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the No R.C.G/823/2014 dated 25 where under cancelled the authorization of the petitioner No.5 resident of Malyavanthunipadu Village Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh and the 07.07.2018 and 24.04 confirmed the order of the 4 illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the principles of natural justice and IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: 24785/2018 ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) following: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature writ of mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the proceedings G/823/2014 dated 25.05.2016 passed by the 4th where under cancelled the authorization of the petitioner fair price shop Malyavanthunipadu Village, Markapuram Mandal Andhra Pradesh and the consequential orders dated 04.2017 of the respondents 2 and 3 where under confirmed the order of the 4th respondent without application of mind is arbitrary and contrary to the principles of natural justice and IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature writ proceedings respondent fair price shop Markapuram Mandal, consequential orders dated 2017 of the respondents 2 and 3 where under respondent without application of mind is arbitrary and contrary to the principles of natural justice and
2
BSB, J
W.P.No.24785 of 2018
consequently set aside the same and pass and pass such other order or orders…..”
2.
No representation for the petitioner, inspite of posting the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 3. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI, J
Date: 29.01.2025 GRL
3
BSB, J
W.P.No.24785 of 2018
187 THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI
Writ Petition No.24785 of 2018
Date: 29.01.2025 GRL