SRI MOHAMMAD AZIMULLA BAIG v. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER
WP/27782/2024 · 2025-04-24
S Sunil Dutt Yadav
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34225 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34225 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16784 WP No. 27782 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 27782 OF 2024 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN:
SRI. MOHAMMAD AZIMULLA BAIG, SON OF MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN BAIG, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, NO.20, THIRD FLOOR, FIRST CROSS, JHBCS LAYOUT, J.P. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE - 560 078. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AKKI MANJUNATH GOWDA K, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER, BBMP, N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU - 560 002.
2.
THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER, BBMP, BEGURU SUB DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560 114.
3.
SMT. RESHMA R, WIFE OF DILIP G, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.706, KALENA AGRAHARA, BEGUR HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 076. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. G.S. VENKAT SUBHA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R3) Digitally signed by PRAKASH N Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16784 WP No. 27782 of 2024
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DIRECT R-1 AND 2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 14.10.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioner has sought for issuance of writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider representation at Annexure-A dated 14.10.2024.
2. Petitioner has made a representation alleging that the private respondent has put up construction without adhering to the requirements in the setback area in terms of the BBMP bye-laws and regulations.
3. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the private respondent that as against the order passed under Section 248(3) of the BBMP Act, 2020 (for short 'The Act'), they have filed an appeal before the Chief Commissioner in
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16784 WP No. 27782 of 2024 Appeal No.306/2024. In light of the same further adjudication is not called.
4. However once the order under Section 248(3) of the Act attains finality, needless to state respondent - BBMP to take steps to ensure that the order passed is taken to its logical end. Accordingly, petition is disposed off. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15 CT: BHK