BAIJNATH RAVIDAS @ BAIJNATH RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./6057/2025 · 2025-10-15
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34221 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34221 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:31935 )
-1- A.B.A. No. 6057 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 6057 of 2025
Baijnath Ravidas @ Baijnath Ram, aged about 39 years, son of Badri Ram, resident of Sultani Daru, P.O. & P.S. Daru, District- Hazaribagh
… Petitioner
-Versus-
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Surmila Kumari, W/o Baijnath Ravidas, D/o Chotan Ravidas, presently residing at Karmatand, Ravidas Tola, P.O. I.E.L. Gomia, P.S. I.E.L. Gomia, District- Bokaro
… Opposite Parties
-----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mahtha, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, A.P.P.
-----
04/15.10.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.587 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 498A/323/504 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is happened to be the husband of the complainant and the case is registered under Section 498-A and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code. He further submits that vague allegation is made of demand of dowry and torture against the petitioner. He also submits that the petitioner has filed a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for restitution of conjugal right.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioner is happened to be the husband and in view of that, the prayer for anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected.
( 2025:JHHC:31935 )
-2- A.B.A. No. 6057 of 2025
5. Considering that the petitioner is happened to be the husband and he has also filed a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act and in that view of the matter, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks after Deepawali vacation and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms, conditions and sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper.
6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 15th October, 2025 Ajay/