Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34220 (PNJ)

SHAILESH TOMAR v. MANOJ KUMAR CHIEF ENGINEER MCG

COCP/1306/2025 · 2025-05-21

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-1306-2025 (O&M) --1-- 177 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1306-2025 (O&M) Decided on:-21.05.2025 Shailesh Tomar ....Petitioner.. vs. Sh. Manoj Kumar, Chief Engineer, Municipal Corporation of Gurugram ....Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Varun Singh Dhanda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek saini, Advocate, for the respondent-MC. ***** HARKESH MANUJA J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the payment for a sum of Rs.1.10 lakh (approx.) along with interest @6% was required to be released in favour of the petitioner from the date of filing of the petition till the date of disbursal, however, the needful has not been done so far. 2. Mr. Vijay Dhaka, Chief Engineer, Municipal Corporation, Gurugram, who is present in person submits that the file has been forwarded by his office to the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Gurugram for approval and, thereafter, the payment shall be released in favour of the petitioner within two weeks from today. 3. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition, as such, the same is disposed of. Rule stands discharged. 3.1 However, in case, the needful is not done, 1/3rd salary of the SONIKA 2025.05.22 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document COCP-1306-2025 (O&M) --2-- respondent as well as the Commissioner, Municipal Commissioner, Gurugram shall remain attached till the compliance is made. 4. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 21.05.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/ No SONIKA 2025.05.22 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document