2025:JHHC:34995 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(S) No.6594 of 2025 ----- Anup Kumar, son of Krishna Chandra Mahto, resident of village Landupdih, PO Landupdih, PS Sonahatu, District Ranchi, Jharkhand … Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, PO Dhurwa, PS Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi 2.Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, PO Dhurwa, PS Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi 3.Director, Directorate of Secondary Education, Department of School Education and Literacy, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, PO Dhurwa, PS Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi 4.Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, through its Secretary, Chaibagan Gali, Kali Nagar, PO and PS Namkum, District Ranchi 5.Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Chaibagan Gali, Kali Nagar, PO and PS Namkum, District Ranchi … Respondent(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amritansh Vats, Advocate Mr. Arpan Manjash Ekka, Advocate For the State : Mr. Uttam Kr. Das, AC to GP-VI For the JSSC : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate Mr. Jay Prakash, Advocate Mr. Tejo Mistry, Advocate …...... 02 /24.11.2025: Heard the parties. 2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that he was not personally called for on the date of document verification. Thus, he could not appear on the date of document verification resulting in rejection of his claim for Trained Graduate Teacher. 3. The issue in respect of personal communication of document verification has already been set at rest by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 143 of 2024 titled “Nirmal Pahan vs. The State of Jharkhand and Others”. 2025:JHHC:34995 2 4. In the aforesaid LPA it has been held that it is not necessary to give individual information to the candidates. 5. Considering the fact that the issue has already been set at rest by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in the aforesaid LPA, I find no merit in this matter, this writ application stands dismissed in terms of the order passed by the aforesaid LPA. 6. However, if the Special Leave Petition which has been filed against the aforesaid order any judgment is passed which favours the petitioner, the said judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court will be made applicable so far as this petitioner also. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 24.11.2025 Tanuj/CP-2 Uploaded on 29.11.2025