2025:HHC:39562 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No. 683 of 2024 Decided on : 22.11.2025 Narayan Dutt Bhardwaj …Petitioner Versus Sh. Bhupender Kumat Attri, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Shimla …Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Suneel Awasthi, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Mr. Mukul Sood, learned counsel for the respondent, apprises the Court that needful with regard to metalling of the road, has been done. 2. Mr. Suneel Awasthi, learned counsel for the petitioner, though acknowledges the factum of the road being metalled, he submits that the work of constructing a retaining wall has been initiated by the Corporation and the same be taken to its logical conclusion expeditiously. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out an 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:39562 infirmity in order dated 13.08.2025 as it stands mentioned therein that metalled road of 2.5 Km be constructed, whereas, the metalled road in issue is not 2.5 Km and in fact, the width thereof was to be reflected in the order, which was 2.5 meter. He submits that this fact be taken on record. 4. This fact is taken on record. It is observed that as there is a typographical error in order dated 13.08.2025, therefore, last Para of this order be read as “metalled road of 2.5 meter width be constructed” instead of “metalled road of 2.5 Km be constructed”. 5. Now, in light of the fact that needful has been done by the respondent, these proceedings are closed, but with the observation that as far as the work of retaining wall etc. is concerned as the process in that regard has been initiated, let the same be also completed as expeditiously as possible. Notice discharged. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 22, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)