Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34211 (BOM)

SUBHASH KONDAJI KHEMNAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/316/2025 · 2025-01-09

Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

952 WP 249 OF 2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 952 WRIT PETITION NO. 316 OF 2025 SUBHASH KONDAJI KHEMNAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Khedkar Avinash S. AGP for Respondents: Mr. M.K. Goyanka Advocate for Respondent nos. 3 & 4 : Mr. A.D. Aghav ... CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , JJ. DATE : 09.01.2025 PER COURT : We have heard both the sides. 2. Irrespective of any other issue, the direction of this Court in the earlier round, whereby the petitioner’s request/representation for a suitable transfer was rejected not by the Chief Executive Officer of the Zilla Parishad but by the Education Officer (Primary), on the ground that the petitioner was transferred to the post as per his request in the general transfer. His appeal has been refused to be entertained by the office of the Commissioner by the impugned communication which bears signature of Deputy Commissioner (Establishment). 3. The writ petition is disposed of directing respondent no. 3-Chief Executive Officer himself to consider the petitioner’s representation once again and if possible at the time of upcoming general transfer. ( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) mkd/- 1/1 2025:BHC-AUG:639-DB