IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 18294 of 2025 Decided on: 24.11.2025 Sahil Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P and another .…Respondents. …………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Ms. Rajni Gandhi, Advocate vice Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Choudhry, Assistant Advocate General, for the respondent No.1. Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent No.2. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since certain documents alongwith annexures in the body of writ petition have not been annexed, hence, she seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law. 2. Granting such liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge November 24, 2025 (yogesh) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes