1 2025:CGHC:34484 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 718 of 2025 1 - Smt. Anita Bali W/o Amit Ayyar Aged About 48 Years R/o Village- Gramidh Bank Ke Pass Pendraroad, Tahsil Pendraroad, District- G.P.M. (C.G.) 2 - Manju Pali W/o Umashankar Pali Aged About 42 Years R/o Ganesh Nagar Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Neeta Sahu W/o Prem Kumar Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o Tikrapara, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Anjali Rahangdale (Wrongly Mentioned As Raahgadaale) W/o Virend Thakre (Wrongly Mentioned As Virendra) Aged About 38 Years R/o Village- Abhanpur, Tahsil- Abhanpur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Smt. Sarita Toppo W/o Anil Kumar Toppo Aged About 46 Years R/o Bhaneshar Mishan Jayramnagar, Tahsil - Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - Shri Rambhuwan Jaiswal (Wrongly Mentioned As Ram Bhuvan) S/o Shivram Jaiswal (Wrongly Mentioned As Shivam) Aged About 48 Years R/o Village- Jogipur, Post- Bandha, Tahsil - Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 7 - Ku. Sita Kachhap D/o Basudeo Ram Kachhap (Wrongly Mentioned As Basudev) Aged About 41 Years R/o Champa, Tahsil - Bagicha, District- Jashpur (C.G.) 8 - Ramkrishna Kashyap S/o Radheshyam Kashyap Aged About 54 Years R/o Village- Semara, Tahsil - Nawagarh, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 9 - Subodh Kumar Shrivas S/o Ram Narayan Shrivas Aged About 42 Years R/o Pendraroad Ward No. 01, District- G.P.M. (C.G.) 10 - Bachan Singh Korchey S/o Baboolal Korchey Aged About 54 Years R/o Village- Ghaghra, Tahsil - Pendraroad, District- G.P.M. (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur (C.G.) ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.09.03 19:54:03 +0530 2 2 - The Secretary Government Of Chhattisgarh, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The District Education Officer Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - The Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A. K. Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 21/07/2025 1. This is an application for correction in the order dated 23-06-2025 passed by this Court in W.P.S. No. 5021/2025. The applicant prayed for the following relief in the application:- “It is, therefore prayed that the Hon’ble Court be pleased to allow this application and the place “Raahgadaale” may kindly be corrected as “Rahangdale” & the place of “Virendra” may kindly be corrected “Virend” & the place “Ram Bhuvan” may kindly be corrected as “Rambhuwan” & place of “Shivam” may kindly be corrected “Shivram” & the place “Basudev” may kindly be corrected as “basudeo”, in the cause title of the order dated 23- 06-2025, in the interest of justice. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that while filing the writ petition, due to a typographical error, there are certain mistakes in the spelling of the names of the persons, including the error in the father’s name of petitioner No. 6, Shri Ram Bhuvan Jaiswal. The correct name of the father of the petitioner No. 6 is “Shivram Jaiswal”, whereas his name is typed as “Shivam Jaiswal”. Therefore, the typographical error may be corrected. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant and perused the order dated 23-06-2025 and pleadings of the writ petition. 3 4. From perusal of the pleadings of the writ petition, it transpires that the petitioner claimed correction in various spelling mistakes in the names of the persons, i.e. “Raahgadaale”, “Virendra”, “Ram Bhuvan”, “Shivam”, “Basudev” which are claimed to be corrected as “Rahangdale”, “Virend”, “Rambhuwan”, “Shivram” and “basudeo”, respectively. Except for the correction of the name of the father of the petitioner No. 6, i.e. “Shivram” in place of “Shivam”, the other correction is not necessary as only the spelling mistakes are claimed, but its pronunciation is the same. Both spellings of such persons are correct. Therefore, except for the correction in the father’s name of the petitioner No. 6 as “Shivram”, in place of “Shivam”, the other claims of the application for correction are rejected, and only “Shivram”, in place of “Shivam” (father’s name of petitioner No. 6) is allowed. 5. The present MCC is partly allowed to the extent indicated hereinabove. A copy of this order shall be made a part of the original order dated 23-06-2025 passed in W.P.S. No. 5021/2025. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok