1 2025:CGHC:39054-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1549 of 2022 1 - Shakuntala Dhruw W/o Fuleshwar Prasad Dhruw Aged About 64 Years Caste Gond, R/o Plot No. 310/12 Chhaya Garden Pragati Nagar, Raisali, Tahsil Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ku. Prabha Dhruw S/o Fuleshwar Prasad Shruw Aged About 36 Years Caste Gond, R/o Plot No. 310/12 Chhaya Garden Pragati Nagar, Raisali, Tahsil Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Devendra Kumar Dhruw S/o Fuleshwar Prasad Dhruw Aged About 38 Years Caste Gond, R/o Plot No. 310/12 Chhaya Garden Pragati Nagar, Raisali, Tahsil Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh .... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Mahanadi, Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Superintendent Of Police Kondagaon,, District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh 3 - Station House Officer, Police Station Farasgaon,, District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.08.07 10:56:18 +0530 2 4 - Smt. Manisha Dhruw W/o Devendra Kumar Dhruw Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Rani Durgavati Ward No. 12, Bazar Para, Farasgaon, District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioners : Mr. Ashwin Panickar, Advocate. For Respondents/ State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 06.08.2025 1. The present CRMP has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer :- “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and quash the first information report registered at police station Farasgaon, District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh for offence punishable under Section 498-A, 34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as criminal investigation of registered crim No. 96/2022, in the interest of justice.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the charges have been framed against the petitioners by the trial Court concerned and the case is fixed for recording of evidence of the prosecution witnesses, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition at this stage, to which learned counsel for the 3 petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh with proper prayer and documents. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection. 4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. 5. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioners/ State after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice S. Bhilwar/ Rahul