APHC010523772024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 27228/2024 Between: 1. IDAVALAPATI RAMANJANEYULU, S/O RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, D.NO.2-90B, PERAYAPALEM, PRAKASAM DIST. 2. CHANDOLU CHANDRA SEKHAR, S/O SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. AGRICULTURIST, R/O D.NO.2-81A, DHENUVAKONDA VILLAGE, DHENUVAKONDA (M), PRAKASAM DIST. 3. YARRAM RAMI REDDY, S/O SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O 5-12, DHENUVAKONDA, DHENUVAKONDA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. PURIMETIA VENKAIAH, S/O VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O PERAYAPALEM (V), PERAYAPALEM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. CHENNUPATI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O VENKATAPPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O D.NO.2-31, PERAYAPALEM (V), PERAYAPALEM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 6. IDAVALAPATI KOTESWARA RAO, S/O RANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. AGRICULTURIST, R/O PERAYAPALEM, PERAYAPALEM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PETROLEUMS ANDCHEMICALS, NEW DELHI. 2. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY SDC, BHARAT PETROLEUM COORPORATION LTD (PIPELINE DIVISION), KRISHNAPATNAM- HYDERABAD PROJECT, D.NO.35-3-69/69/370/510, MIG-123, HOUSING BOARD COLONY, ONGOLE - 523001 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in lying the petrol and gas pipeline through the irrigation canal by deviating the initial gazatte plan without considering the representation Dt. 18-11-2024 made by the petitioners is illegal, arbitrary, capricious and violative of Article 14, 21, and 300A of constitution of India. Consequently direct the respondent not to lay the petroleum and gas pipeline through the irrigation canal without taking any action on the representation made by the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents not to lay petroleum and gas pipeline through the irrigation canal till the disposal of the representation made by the petitioners pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N A RAMACHANDRA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: In pursuance of letter dated 06.03.2025 addressed to the Registrar (Judicial), learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 10.03.2025 TVN 117 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.27228 OF 2024 Date: 10.03.2025 TVN