w APHC010016512011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 8892 OF 2011 Between: P.S. Gandhi, S/o. Pakeerdora, Hindu, aged about 63 Retired Principal, S.V.L.N.S.V.P. Visakhapatnam District years. Occupation; Visakhapatnam, Junior College, ...PETITIONER AND 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secondary Education (IE) Department Hyderabad rep. by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, 2. The Director of Intermediate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3. The Regional Joint Director of Intermediate E.G. District. 4. The Education, Rajahmundry, Secretary/Correspondent, S.V.L.N.S.V.P. Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District Junior College ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2 nd respondent in issuing the 25.10.2010 rejecting the proceedings Rc. No. Admn.l-B-2/343/10, dated propels of the 3'^'^ respondent for admission of services of petitioner into grant- in-aid in the cadre of principal by way of promotion is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional consequently direct the respondent No.1 to 3 to admit the services of the petitioner into grant-in-aid in the cadre of principal in the 4*^ ' . respondent with effect from 05.08.2004 and also direct the respondents to the consequential benefits attached to the post of principal in the 4 respondent college. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. V. SUBBA REDDY(Not Appeared) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following order: pay APHC010016512011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 8892/2011 Between: 1.P.S. GANDHI, S/0. PAKEERDORA RETIRED PRINCIPAL S.V.L.N.S.V.P. JUNIOR COLLEGE, VISAKHAPATNAM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE GOVT OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECONDARY EDUCATION (IE) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS HYDERABAD 2.THE DIRECTOR OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD 3.THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF INTERMEDIATE, EDUCATION, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRICT 4.THE SECRETARY / CORRESPONDENT, S.V.L.N.S.V.P. JUNIOR COLLEGE, VISAKHAPATNAM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action respondent in issuing the proceedings Rc.No.Admn.IB/343/10, dated 25.10.10 rejecting the proposals of the 3'^'^ respondent for admission of services of the petitioner into grant-in- aid in the cadre of principal by way of promotion is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional consequently direct the respondent No.1 to 3 to admit the services of the petitioner into grant-in-aid in the cadre of principal in the 4*^ respondent with effect from 05.08.2004 and also direct the respondents to pay the consequential benefits attached to the post of principal in the 4*^ respondent college and pass such order or orders in the circumstances of the case. 2^161 of the lA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 11040 OF 2011) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the writ petition otherwise the petitioner would be put to irreparable loss and harm. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.K VSUBBA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following: r THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 8892 of 2011 ORDER: Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there representation for the petitioner. It evinces that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting his case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. IS no Sd/- J. SAROJA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// N OFFICER SE To, 1. One CC to Sri K. V. Subba Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Higher Education, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies ssb \ ,<> HIGH COURT 1 DATED:04/07/2025 ORDER WP No.8892 OF 2011 ''«S£ai£Sj^^ DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS