Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34185 (JHR)

JASBIR SINGH ALIAS VICKY SINGH ALIAS JASBIR SINGH VICKY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5992/2025 · 2025-10-07

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:30873 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5992 of 2025 Jasbir Singh @ Vicky Singh @ Jasbir Singh Vicky, aged about 34 years, son of Late Kaka Singh, R/o Dimna Road near Swarnrekha Project, P.O & P.S. Olidih, Mango, Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum--- --- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Opp. Party --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath --- For the Petitioner: M/s A.K. Kashyap, Sr.Advocate, Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the O.P-State: Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P. --- 04 / 07.10.2025 Heard the parties. 2. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Olidih P.S. Case No. 94 of 2025 for the offences registered under sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and section 27 of Arms Act, pending in the court of Shri K.S. Tripathi, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur. 3. On 18.04.2025, son of the Informant went missing. On the next day, his dead body was recovered from a place near Tirkey Garden. During the course of investigation, co-accused Krishna Singh and this petitioner were apprehended. Statement of Krishna Singh was recorded first in time and on his confession, murder weapon was recovered. It appears that the petitioner has also confessed his guilt and, on his confession, two live cartridges and the mobile phone of the deceased were recovered from a bush at the place of occurrence. 4. Mr. A.K. Kashyap, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submitted that the confession of the petitioner was recorded after the confession of the co-accused Krishna Singh. It was further submitted that though mobile phone of the deceased is alleged to have been recovered on the pointing out of this petitioner, but the seizure list does not bear his signature. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Shri K.S. Tripathi, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Olidih P.S. Case No. 94 of 2025. (Ambuj Nath, J) October 07, 2025 Ranjeet/ Uploaded