1 2025:CGHC:44099 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6157 of 2023 1 - Vivek Lakra S/o Shri Prasad Lakra, Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Tetartoli Jurguh, P.S. And Tahsil Jashpur, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) Permanent Address- Village Bamhnidand, Post- Komdo, P.S. And Tahsil Jashpur, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Skill Development, Training And Technical Education And Employment, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions, Skill Development, Training And Technical Education And Employment, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Joint Director, Industrial Training Institutes, Ambikapur, Region, Distt. Surguja (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondent(s) Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sahu, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Akanksha Singh, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Ankur Kashyap, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 29/08/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ by directing the respondent authorities to consider petitioner's case and declare the petitioner as 'Eligible' for the post of Training Officer (Electrician) and issue appointment order of petitioner for the post of Training Officer (Electrician), in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the Annexure P/1, whereby petitioner's candidature has been rejected on the ground that mark-sheet of High School and Higher Secondary does not contain date of birth of petitioner as the same is arbitrary, in the interest of justice. 3 10.3 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in favour of the petitioner may kindly be passed. 10.4 Cost of the petition may be awarded.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat