APHC010524652024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4381/2024 Between: 1. KETHA VENKATA RAMANA REDDY, S/O. VENKATA SUBBA REDDY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC CLASS II CONTRACTOR, FLAT.NO. 301, PLOT.NO. 80, SRI SIRI AVENUE, ROAD NO.3, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R. DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SHRI SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH, SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, MGNREG SCHEME, KRISHI BHAVAN, DR. RAJENDRAPASAD ROAD, NEW DELHI-110001. 4. SHRI DHARMVIR JHA, DIRECTOR, MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME, KRISHI BHAVAN, DR. RAJENDRAPRASAD ROAD, NEW DELHI 5. SRI V R KRISHNA TEJA MYLAVARAPU IAS, THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR. 2 HBKM,J C.C.No.4381 of 2024 6. DR G LAKSHMISHA IAS, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, N.T.R DISTRICT AT VIJAYAWADA. 7. SRI B BALU NAIK, THE ENGINEERING CHIEF, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, PUNNAMMATHOTA, LABBIPET, VIJAYAWADA, A.P. N.T.R DISTRICT. 8. SRI VENKATA RAMANA RAO, SUPEINTENDENTING ENGINEER, MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME, PRI DIVISION, N.T.R DISTRICT AT VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R DISTRICT. 9. SRI Z RAMESH, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA CLUSTER, N.T.R. DISTRICT 10. SRI B MURALI, EXTENSION OFFICER-CUM-PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, VELAGALERU GRAMAPANCHAYAT, MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME VELAGALERU VILLAGE, G. KONDURU MANDAL, N.T.R. DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GORLA MANASA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY R 2. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 3 HBKM,J C.C.No.4381 of 2024 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.2 and 5 submits that the order under contempt has already been complied with. 2. He further submits that the balance amount of Rs.17,13,272/- was paid to the petitioner on 30.03.2025. 3. In view of the same, no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 4. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 01.08.2025 PGT