GYARSI DEVI W/O LATE SHRI DAULATRAM SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/15693/2024 · 2025-01-10
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34175 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34175 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:1558] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.15693/2024 Gyarsi Devi W/o Late Shri Daulatram Saini, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Sarai Bawari Delhi Road, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 10/01/2025
1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.230/2024, registered at Police Station Amer, District Jaipur City (North) for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 504, 427, 379, 447 and 120-B of IPC, the accused-petitioner has preferred this criminal misc. bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is argued that the name of the accused-petitioner is not mentioned in the FIR, there are no allegations that the accused-petitioner has forged any documents, the allegations of forging the document is against the other co-accused Narangi and the other co-accused Sahid Khan, who has already been enlarged on regular bail by this Court vide order dated 03.01.2024 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.15181/2024. The accused-petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation, custodial interrogation
[2025:RJ-JP:1558] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15693/2024] of the accused-petitioner is not required, therefore, the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner.
4. Heard and perused the material available on the record.
5. Considering the fact that the name of the accused-petitioner is not mentioned in the FIR, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner-Gyarsi Devi W/o Late Shri Daulatram Saini, in connection with FIR No.230/2024, registered at Police Station Amer, District Jaipur City (North), she shall be released on bail, provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-15