- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:8664 RP No. 549 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM REVIEW PETITION NO. 549 OF 2024 BETWEEN: UNIVERSITY OF MYSORE, UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK, CROWFORD HALL, MYSURU-570 005, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJENDRA KUMAR SUNGAY T P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DR. D.V. GOPALAPPA S/O. VENKATANARASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RETIRED READER OF ECONOMICS, R/AT NO. 269, LAKSHMINRUKESARI, 4TH MAIN, BANK COLONY, BOGADI RING ROAD CIRCLE, MYSURU-570 026. 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, MULTI STORIED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHRIDHAR PRABHU, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA LAGALI, AGA FOR R2) Digitally signed by NAGARAJA B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:8664 RP No. 549 of 2024 THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF CPC , PRAYING TO REVIEW /MODIFY THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 18.06.2024 PASSED IN W.P.9038/2024(S RES) (VIDE ANNEXURE A) BY THIS HONBLE COURT BY ALLOWING THIS REVIEW PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER This review petition is filed seeking review of the Order dated 18.06.2024 passed in Writ petition No.9038/2024 (S-RES). 2. Counsel for the petitioner was granted an opportunity to present his arguments in support of the review petition. However, upon a detailed examination of the grounds raised therein, this Court finds that all the contentions and issues put forth by the petitioner have already been thoroughly considered and addressed in the order passed in the writ petition. After careful scrutiny, the Court is of the firm view that there are no justifiable or - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:8664 RP No. 549 of 2024 legally sustainable grounds to warrant a review of the said order. The petitioner has failed to satisfy the essential legal requirements necessary for the Court to entertain a review petition. In the absence of any error apparent on the face of the record or any other valid ground justifying a reconsideration of the order, this Court finds no merit in the present petition. Consequently, the review petition is not maintainable under law. 3. Review petition is devoid of merits. Review petition stands dismissed. SD/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE BNV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50 CT:SNN