Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34171 (RAJ)

SURENDRA SINGH S/O SHRI RAMESH DAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15336/2024 · 2025-05-23

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:21720] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 15336/2024 Surendra Singh S/o Shri Ramesh Dan, R/o House No. 57, Khirni Phatak Road, Nanupuri Colony, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.S. Hasan, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Girraj P. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 23/05/2025 1. This second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.384/2024 registered at Police Station Bagru, District Jaipur (West) for the offences under Sections 178, 179, 180, 313(4) & 61(2)(a) of the BNS, 2023. 2. First bail application of the petitioner bearing S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.13360/2024 was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 08.11.2024 with liberty to file fresh bail application after filing of the charge-sheet. 3. Heard. 4. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the material available on record. 5. In the present case in all there are three accused-persons. [2025:RJ-JP:21720] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15336/2024] 6. The learned trial Court vide order dated 05.03.2025 has framed the charges for offneces punishable under Sections 178, 179, 180 and 181 of the BNS, 2023 against all the three accused persons. 7. Two of the co-accused, namely, Shivam Singh Bareth and Premchand have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders dated 21.10.2024 and 15.10.2024 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Applications No.12955/2024 and 12054/2024 respectively. 8. Having regard the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 14.08.2024 and so as to maintain the parity as the co-accused facing were facing same charges have already been enlarged on bail, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 9. Accordingly, the second bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above in connection with the aforesaid FIR shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together, with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /4