- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:17608-DB CCC No. 1080 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1080 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. C. K. RAJU, S/O. MUNISWAMY RAJU, AGE: ABOUT 70 YEARS, 2. SRI. M. RAVIKUMAR S/O. MUNISWAMY, AGE: 58 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT NO. 153, 32ND B MAIN, 5TH CROSS, ITI AND TMCS LAYOUT, VYSHYA BANK COLONEY, 1ST PHASE, J. P. NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 078. …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI. P. MAHESHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. DEEPA. M. IAS., THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, ROOM NO. 434, VIKHASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by PRABHAKAR SWETHA KRISHNAN Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:17608-DB CCC No. 1080 of 2024 2. SRI. JAYARAM. N THE COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (BDA), T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 020. 3. SRI. MANJUNATH DOMBAR THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (BDA), T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 020. 4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR BHEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001. …ACCUSED (BY SMT. PRAMODHINI KISHAN, AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, R/W SECTION 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR CONTEMPT OF THIS HONBLE COURT FOR DISOBEYING THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONBLE COURT IN WA.NO.1165/2006 DATED 30.08.2023 AND THE SAME HAS BEEN MODIFIED ON 26.09.2024. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:17608-DB CCC No. 1080 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) The compliance is done by the respondents by deciding the representation. 2 The contempt petition does not survive as rightly pointed by learned Advocate Government Advocate Mr.Chandrashekar 3 Learned Advocate for the petitioner Mr. prayed to the court that liberty may be reserved for the petitioner to challenge the endorsement, rejecting the representation. 4 Such liberty is reserved. 5. Petition is disposed of accordingly Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 53 CT: BHK