M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co., Ltd., v. Bommadevara Babu Rao
WA/1097/2012 · 2025-07-28
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34166 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34166 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IS. APHC010S22862012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI SMS TUESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, THE CHIEF JUSTICE^ AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 1097 OF 2012 ^ Writ Appeal under clause ifof the Letters Patent 25.5.2012 in WP.No. 15571 of 2012 on the file of High Court. Between; against the order dt. M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co., Ltd. No.54-15-5, 2nd Floor, Dhoom Complex, Srinivasa Nagar, Bank Colony, NH-5, Vijayawada, Krishna District. Rep. by it's Manager, Door ...Petitioner AND Bommadevara Babu Rao, S/o Narasimha Rao, Village, Penamaluru Mandal, Krishna District. The Reserve Bank of India, Rep. by it's Regional Manager, Opp: Birla Temple, Saifabad, Hyderabad
1. R/o 2-54, Kankipadu
2. ...Respondents [A NO; 3 OF 2012rWAMP 2282 OF 2012") Petition under Section 1^ CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
' > suspend the orders dt. 25.52012^ade in WP.No. 15571/2(rr2 of the learned single judge of this Hon'ble Court. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI O UDAYA KUMAR -- Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: SRI RAMA MOHAN PALANKI The Court made the following order:
APHC010522862012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Bench Sr.No:-i06 {3483] lam AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 1097 of 2012 M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co., Ltd., ...Appellant Vs. Bommadevara Babu Rao and Others ...Respondent(s) ********** Advocate for Appellants: Advocate for Respondents; Mr. O Udaya Kumar Mr. Rama Mohan Palanki
CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 29th July 2025 PC :
Learned counsel for the appellant states that the appeal is rendered infructuous inasmuch as the writ petitioner did not pay the amount
directed by the learned single Judge. Failure to pay the amount so ordered by the writ petitioner, the appellant, as per the judgment, was entitled to proceed against the writ petitioner, which it had. as was Be that as it may, the writ appeal is rendered infructuous and is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs.
2 HCJ a RC, J W.A. No: 1097 of 2012 Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 'SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri. O Udaya Kumar Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to Sri. Rama Mohan Palanki Advocate [OPUCp
3. Two CD Copies GSC
HIGH COURT DATED:29/07/2025
ORDER WANO. 1097 OF 2012 I ^ 2 AUG 2025 . {section . m DISPOSING THE WA AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS