Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34164 (CAL)

ALPANA PAUL AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

MAT/1161/2025 · 2025-07-29

Debangsu Basak, Prasenjit Biswas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

DL-20 29.07.2025 Court No.26 (AD) MAT 1161 of 2025 With IA No.: CAN 1 of 2025 With IA No.: CAN 2 of 2025 Smt. Alpana Paul & Anr. Vs. The Union of India & Ors Mr. Aniruddha Chatterjee, Ld. Sr. Advocate Mr. Lal Mohan Hazra, Advocate Mr. Somesh Panja, Advocate Mrs. Anuradha Hazra, Advocate Mrs. Moutusi Hazra, Advocate … for the appellants Mr. Dipanjan Datta, Advocate Ms. Sukanya Datta, Advocate … for the Union Bank of India Mr. K.C. Garg, Advocate Ms. Sumita Agarwal, Advocate … for the Respondent No.9 1. IA No.: CAN 1 of 2025 is an application seeking leave to file an appeal. 2. Learned Advocate appearing for the writ petitioner, on instructions from the writ petitioner who is present in Court, submits that the writ petitioner does not wish to proceed with the writ petition any further. 3. Bank is represented. 4. Since the appellants claim themselves guarantor of the borrower whose property was sold, we add the appellants as party-respondents in the appeal. We grant leave to the appellants to prefer the appeal. 2 5. As the writ petitioner does not wish to proceed with the writ petition itself, impugned order passed in the writ petition is set aside. 6. MAT 1161 of 2025 and all connected applications are disposed of without any order as to costs. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)