APHC010522822018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [2592] WEDNESDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 24665 OF 2018 Between: M/s. Man Power Servicing Agencies ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T S VENKATARAMANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 24665 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “…..to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the impugned e-Tender Notification No.296/2016/F1 dated 18.11.2017 and the consequential proceedings Lr.Roc.No.296/F1/2016 dated 03.04.2018 issued by 3rd respondent without following the provisions of A.P.Municipal Tender Rule 3(2), 5(2), 8(3), G.O.Ms.No.475 dated 28.08.1989, G.O.Ms.581 dated 6.11.1996, G.O.Ms.No.30 MA and UD GII dated 18.01.2000 and contrary to the orders passed by the Hon’ble High Court in Writ Appeal Nos.1087, 1090, 1108, 1111, 1112, 1115 and 1124 of 2016 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of law and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to entrust the portion of the work to the petitioner agencies and pass such other orders....” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for an adjudication by this Court. 3. While recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 02.04.2025 KK THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 24665 OF 2018 02.04.2025 KK declaring the impugned eTender Notification No 296/2016/F1 dated 18112017 and the consequential proceedings Lr Roc No 296/F1/2016 dated 03 04 2018 issued by 3rd respondent without following the provisions of AP Municipal Tender Rule 32 52 83 G0 Ms No 475 dated 28 08 1989 GO Ms 581 dated 6111996 GO Ms No 30 MA and UD GII dated 18012000 and contrary to the orders passed by the Honble High Court in Writ Appeal Nos 1087 1090 1108 1111 1112 1115 and1124 of 2016 as illegal arbitrary violation of law and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to entrust the portion of the work to the petitioner agencies