[2025:RJ-JP:17689] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18533/2024 Taravati D/o Sh. Rajaram, aged about 29 Years, R/o Village Gheekaka, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Alwar PIN:-301702 (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, through its Secretary, Department of Medical Health & Family Welfare, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur 302005 (Raj.). 2. The Director, State Institute of Health Family Welfare (SIHFW), Jhalana Institutional Area, Near Doordarshan Kendra, Jaipur 302004. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with Ms. Anjali Sharma, Advocate & Mr. Prakhar Jain, Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 25/04/2025 1. Both the parties jointly submitted that in similar matters i.e., S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8922/2024 titled as Radha Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., this Court has given the following directions:- "(i) Considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the proposal made by the respective sides for constituting a fresh Medical Board at SMS Hospital and formation of committee in this regard by Principal, SMS Hospital, for carrying out the physical test by a competent authority (any person as State deems competent), to ensure certainty and time bound adjudication of the matter, this Court directs that Principal, SMS Hospital, Jaipur to consider the case of petitioners and constitute a Medical Board within a period of 10 days from the date of passing of this order, and the said [2025:RJ-JP:17689] (2 of 2) [CW-18533/2024] Board after appropriate analysis shall furnish result in a fair and transparent manner, strictly in accordance with law. It is made clear that the reexamination result/report shall be final and binding upon the respective sides. (ii) The petitioners are directed to report on 19.03.2025 at appropriate time as specified by the Principal, SMS Medical Hospital or the competent authority, at SMS Hospital, Jaipur." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the instant writ petition was not connected with the earlier set of writ petitions, therefore, he has been deprived of consideration by the Medical Board. Therefore, he prayed that a similar order may be passed in his case also. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objections, if any such directions is given. 4. Accordingly, in the light of the directions given in the case of Radha (supra), petitioner is directed to report before the Principal, SMS Medical Hospital on 30.04.2025 for consideration by the Medical Board. 5. As observed in the case of Radha (supra), both the parties undertake that the re-examination result/report shall be final and binding upon the respective sides. 6. In view of the above discussions, the present Writ Petition stands disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/212