Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34153 (AP)

Yogesh Nabilal Khale v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/10497/2025 · 2025-10-22

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10497/2025 Between: Yogesh Nabilal Khale ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. BHOOMA MAHARSHI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.3 on bail in Crime No.46 of 2025 of Government Railway Station, Chittoor District, was registered against the Petitioner/Accused No.3 herein for the offences punishable under Section 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘the BNS’). 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 2 3. The allegation against the petitioner/Accused No.3 is that, being a habitual offender, he snatched the chain of a passenger from a halted train. It is further stated that a total of 21 cases have been registered against the petitioner. The petitioner was arrested on execution of P.T. Warrant on 26.07.2025. He has been in judicial custody for the past 93 days. So far eight (8) witnesses are examined. Thus the substantial portion of the investigation in so far the alleged involvement of the petitioner concerned is completed. The petitioner is permanent resident of Maharashtra State. He has got fixed abode. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of allegations levelled against the Petitioner/Accused No.3, this Court is inclined to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.3 on bail. 5. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed with the following stringent conditions: i. The petitioner/Accused No.3 shall be enlarged on bail subject to he executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only), with two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Nellore. ii. The petitioner/Accused No.3 shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned, on every Saturday in between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till cognizance is taken by the learned the Trial Court. 3 iii. The petitioner/Accused No.3 shall not leave the limits of the State of Andhra Pradesh without prior permission from the Station House Officer concerned. iv. The petitioner/Accused No.3 shall not commit or indulge in commission of any offence in future. v. The petitioner/Accused No.3 shall cooperate with the investigating officer in further investigation of the case and shall make himself available for interrogation by the investigating officer as and when required. vi. The petitioner/Accused No.3 shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. vii. The petitioner/Accused No.3 shall surrender his passport, if any, to the investigating officer. If he claim that he do not have a passport, he shall submit an affidavit to that effect to the Investigating Officer. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 23.10.2025 S D P 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10497 OF 2025 23.10.2025 S D P