Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34151 (ORI)

ACHYUTANANDA BEHERA v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/10394/2018 · 2025-07-16

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C ) No.10394 of 2018 Achyutananda Behera …. Petitioner Mr. B.B. Mishra, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. M.R. Mohanty, AGA Mr. B.S. Rayaguru, Adv. (for O.P. No.5) Mr. B. Mohapatra, Adv. (for O.P. No.4) COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 16.07.2025 7. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- It is therefore prayed that the writ application be admitted notice be issued to the Opp. Partis to show cause as to why the appointment of the Petitioner shall not be re-designated as “Lab. Bearer” in the dept. of Chemistry of Bodh Panchayat College, Boudh and his name shall not be recommended for Block Grant as due and admissible in law in view of letter of the Principal dt.22.04.2018 if they fail to show cause or show in sufficient cause writ of Mandamus be issued commanding the Opp. Parties to re- designate the post of the Petitioner as “Lab. Bearer” in the Dept. of Chemistry and recommend to receive block grant in view of the letter of the Principal under Annexure-5. p. 2 p. 2 And any other writ/writs, orderf/orders direction/directions be issued as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper. And for this act of kindness, the Petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray. And further pray that Hon’ble Court may pass any order/order(s), writ/writ(s), direction/direction(s) deemed fit and proper to this case. And for this act of kindness the Petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray. 4. Considering the dispute involved, this Court while disposing the Writ Petition grants liberty to the Petitioner to move Opp. Party No.3 to get the benefit as prayed for. 5. It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, Opp. Party No.3 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months thereafter. The order so passed by the Opp. Party No.3 be communicated to the petitioner. 6. The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge sangita