1 21-wp-6187-25.odt IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 21 WRIT PETITION NO. 6187 OF 2025 Nitinkumar Prabhakar Saner VERSUS The President, Gram Vikas Shikshan Mandal, Marwad And Others … Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Y. M. Patil AGP for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 : Smt. K. B. P. Bharswadkar Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : Mr. A. V. Hon … CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. Dated : August 17, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed below exhibit 5 rejecting his application for stay. Challenge is also raised to the order of termination dated 08.08.2024. 2. The learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that now the matter is posted for final argument. Therefore, he satisfied if directions are issued to decide the pending appeal within stipulated period. 3. Since the substantive appeal is already pending final adjudication before School Tribunal, there is no question of granting any stay at this stage and stay the matter at the stage of argument. Hence I pass the following order : 2026:BHC-AUG:37768 2 21-wp-6187-25.odt (1) The Presiding Officer, School Tribunal Nashik to decide the pending appeal within a period of three months from the date of this order. (2) With the above directions, petition stands disposed of. ( MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. ) shp