[2025:RJ-JP:4289] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15092/2024 Abhishek Meena S/o Late Shri Shivshankar Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 4068, Meenapada, Purani Basti, Below Nahargarh Kilao, Jaipur (Rajasthan) (At Present Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15535/2024 Mohit Meena Son Of Shri Hanuman Sahay Meena, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Hanuman Colony, Near Jagatpura Railway Station, Modal Town, Police Station, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, Permanent Address Village Bhavpura, Nada Ki Dhani, Bainad Mod, Police Station, Basti, Jaipur. (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16114/2024 Teekaram Meena S/o Gopal Lal Meena, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Gram Post Rayseena, Tehsil Nadauti, District Gangapur City. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Monu Kumar, Adv., for Mr. Sudhir Jain, Adv., Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Adv., with Mr. Lokendra Sharma, Adv. and Mr. Asgar Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP, Mr. Rishiraj Singh Rathore, PP [2025:RJ-JP:4289] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-15092/2024] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/01/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.358/2024, registered at Police Station Malviya Nagar, District Jaipur City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(2), 125, 131, 352, 351(2), 111(2)(b) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submit that FIR has been registered in this matter on the basis of information, received by the Police from informant that there is firing between two groups. He further submits that it is a case of no injury as none of the person has sustained any injury. He argues that trial of the case will take considerable time. He contends that the petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially the fact that it is a case of no injury and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking [2025:RJ-JP:4289] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-15092/2024] to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1. Abhishek Meena S/o Late Shri Shivshankar Meena, 2. Mohit Meena Son Of Shri Hanuman Sahay Meena and 3. Teekaram Meena S/o Gopal Lal Meena shall be released on bail provided, each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners, as directed above. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the [2025:RJ-JP:4289] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-15092/2024] notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/132-134